S1, E3 – Idealist – skeptic – cynic – scoffer (or fool): Which one are you? (Essay)

The audio version of this podcast can be found at https://anchor.fm/midnightsleo.

The topics of idealism and cynicism come up a lot in law enforcement circles – often as if they are opposites. I think there’s a better way to look at it….

Now that I’ve started to line up interviews and consider topics for this podcast, I am reminded how law enforcement is truly a subgroup of the larger society. In sociology, a subgroup is two or more humans who interact and share similar characteristics. A subgroup might be temporary – such as people bonding while waiting at a bus stop or as they might face a shared, passing problem such as long lines at the Department of Motor Vehicles. Yet when people share the same social function or status, or cultural, ethnic, or racial identities and challenges, those social bonds might become more profound and lasting. As a social subgroup grows in a sense of unity, both positive and negative communal behavior patterns and outlooks can result.

For example, look at law enforcement. Most officers view themselves as set apart from others in their community due to the special nature and challenges of their shared vocation. Over time, they might start to isolate from those outside their law enforcement group. This might not be intentional. Perhaps they grow tired of answering what they view as stupid questions about policing, or they have heard one to many stories while attending a party about another cop who gave someone a ticket ten years ago. And as we have seen recently – much as in the 60s and 70s – some people can lump all of law enforcement together and therefore hate all those associated with law enforcement…the “all cops are bastards” crowd. These kind of people have always been around, but at times of social turmoil and disorganization, they can feel more safe about coming to the fore with their opinions if not attacks. Negative consequences during such periouds can grow less likely, and so such people can grow more bold.

As humans, as social beings, officers will likely start to more strongly identify and socially bond with those who share in this law enforcement experience over time than with others who do not. This law enforcement subgroup can affirm a sense of self-value and clear purpose. It can become a place of protection if not escape. That’s likely why some bars become “cop bars” over time. I’m going to reveal my age again. It’s much like the theme song to the old sitcom Cheers, “Sometimes you want to go; Where everybody knows your name; And they’re always glad you came; You want to be where you can see; Our troubles are all the same.”

So on one hand, subgroups or subcultures can be positive. They create a place of refuge and strength. Take for example what happens after an officer dies. Brothers and sisters in law enforcement grieve with the members of the suffering agency. More than that, they likely take up collections and send all kinds of support. At the same time, such a strong identity can lead to problems if we are not careful. Isolation can lead to group think. Unchallenged, unhealthy attitudes can take root and create a faulty lens for us as we look out on the world. Almost like an infection, negativity and hopelessness spreads. You might hear things like: “Everything is terrible.” “No one can be trusted.” “We are the only ones who care for one another.” This mindset is not reality. It is black and white thinking…the same thinking many addicted people develop in the greater society often leading them to make poor if not harmful choices. And yet time and again, I see law enforcement personnel fall into that same trap. If you look at officers who end up in legal or marital trouble, you often don’t have to look very hard to discover they might just share in this black and white, cynical, doomsday kind of thinking. Indeed, departments that tend to have scandals and corruption often share this trait among its employees.

Cops are humans, and much like those addicts, we have a choice to be healthy or not. It is not always easy, but it always remains possible. We need to strive to see ourselves and our world as it really is. It isn’t all unicorns and rainbows, nor is it all dark and dangerous. A healthy worldview, I would suggest, is in the middle someplace…and as humans, we might find ourselves on a sliding continuum of sorts based on our resiliency factors, liabilities and context. I also want to suggest there is no one, linear model reflecting all officers’ experiences. Everyone is different, and conditions and healthy practices may change causing us to switch directions suddenly or over time.

So, we might seem to bounce from one phase to another dramatically, or we might find that we have the means to stay relatively balanced toward the center of the scale. In the best case scenario, we will have the resiliency factors – including support networks in and outside of policing – to help maintain what people might label a more positive (if not healthy) well-rounded attitude about life. In general, though, I find four basic points on that sliding scale. I’ve identified them based on my personal experience in my own life as an officer and afterward, plus research, as well as study of what I consider scripture. I call these points: idealist – skeptic – cynic – scoffer or fool.(1)

When I bring up the idealist, I’m thinking a lot about my first shift, my first arrest, and the many positive men and women who helped me have a great (if relatively short) law enforcement career. Many people go into policing because they want to help people. Perhaps they have suffered or faced injustices themselves, and so they now want to protect others from the same fate. None of that is bad in and of itself, but soon the real-world breaks in. Our sense of call is going to be challenged by people and events we encounter. We were idealistic and perhaps a bit naïve when we started, but now we begin to wonder: “Why don’t people like me? Why won’t they respect me? I’m here to help.” Yet, after a few weeks or less, we discover the truth. The world is a complicated place. It is not easily controllable, and the line between evil and good can easily become blurred. On top of that, you might start to suspect you can’t easily trust anyone. You can arrive on a scene to help someone who is injured and be met by insults, rocks and bottles, or worse. Day after day, facing people who might deceive you – in order to hurt you or others – well, that can wear you down. It can begin to defeat that idealism and transform it into something else for good or ill.

I would suggest that a healthy skepticism is an answer to this conundrum. Most faith traditions – Christian or not – understand we live in an imperfect world with imperfect people. In my tradition, Martin Luther used to talk about people being “bent inwards upon themselves.” We all tend to be selfish or at least struggle with selfishness. If you are a member of the Abrahamic faith traditions – Jewish, Christian, or Islamic – we often talk about this as a fallen world. And so, as a person in a fallen world, I recognize that even people who love me might fail me at times, just as I might fail them. We are only human after all. We can do everything right, but raindrops and sunlight fall on the just and unjust alike. Bad things can happen to good people. It is a dangerous world, and some people echo that danger in the choices they make…but other choices are possible. Some people can be trusted. Some people will even actually do their best to try to love you. And so being a healthy skeptic, like a scientist, we observe and test. We don’t have to trust people suddenly or blindly, even as we can hope for the best. We can take proper safety precautions and be ready for things to break bad, but we don’t have to be on – hyper alert – at all times…in every place and social situation. We can still sit facing the doorways at restaurants. We can be aware of people keep their hands. We can keep proper distances from people as we talk to them. We can even ask for backup…but we don’t have to assume everyone is evil. A healthy skeptic in my construct is a person that knows evil exists in the world, but they aren’t themselves consumed by it or the fear of such evil. They know and trust good exists in the world. That goodness can even start within their own life.

Another stop on this sliding continuum is the cynic. Some people suggest cynicism promotes safety.(2) Yet again, I would identify for our purposes that a healthy skepticism and cynicism is not the same thing. We are talking of modern cynicism, not the Greco-Roman philosophical approach. An online article in Psychology today explains this pretty well: “’Cynicism’ acquired its modern meaning in the course of the 18th and early 19th centuries, stripping Ancient Cynicism of most of its tenets and retaining only the Cynic propensity to puncture people’s pretensions. Today, cynicism refers to doubt or disbelief in the professed motives, sincerity, and goodness of others, and, by extension, in social and ethical norms and values. This attitude is often accompanied by mistrust, scorn, and pessimism about others and humanity as a whole.” Did you catch that? The modern cynic is a doubter if not a downer to an extreme. They tend not to trust anyone, and as a result they often think the worst of everyone. They often feel like victims. And so, the risk here becomes beginning to rationalize one’s own cutting of moral and ethical corners. “Everyone else does it, so why not you?” You, the listener, might feel like life is like that for you at times. I did at one time, but in the end, I discovered that it left me bitter and self-isolated…suffering needlessly…prone to making choices not helping but hurting myself and others.

Such bad choices, perhaps originally meant to protect us, can do harm in subtle ways at first, but trust me, they can prove to be cumulative. I’ve got stories that I will probably later share, but research bears this view out. The world is not all bad even as it might be fallen and dangerous. Being on the defensive from all harm will likely leave a person bitter, alone, and perhaps addicted to unhealthy relationships, alcohol, gambling, or who knows what else over time. Cynicism can put one at risk of depression, if not suicidal ideation. It can impact blood pressure and other areas of one’s health if we don’t somehow get a grip…and what we need to grip onto might just be another imperfect but loving human’s hand.

The last group on my scale is the scoffer or fool. I’m using some Biblical language here from my Judeo-Christian tradition, so let me try to explain. In the Hebrew scriptures, a righteous person was a person who tried to live in the ways of God…they sought to follow God’s laws and precepts because they trust that, although the road can be hard, it is the right road for them. These are the decision points needing to be made, based on loving morals and ethics, that will (we believe) lead to happiness no matter what others might say. In fact, even as things might prove tough, this person believes one will find joy on the journey in doing the right thing and in pleasing one’s understanding of God, one’s higher power. Or, one might even dare say we find joy in just fulfilling the law of love no matter what consequences might result.

This construct I am suggesting need not be solely a Judeo-Christian one. In my work among Native populations, as they use their own religious beliefs, I heard people speak of following the Red Road, a road of traditional, loving, spiritual, communal, and practical practices and choices, to free themselves from addiction. Most faith traditions and philosophical paradigms try to help people orient toward what is deemed good – often loving others as oneself. Yet, in the Bible scoffers and fools choose another way. They make themselves the god of their destiny regardless of how many times their choices fail them, or no matter who else gets hurt. And if you are silly enough to want to love others in your choices? Well, they say YOU are the fool.

Now, we all can struggle at times with any of these points on the scale. There might be a constant sliding as we mature, or we might have experienced a point on this scale during a prolonged period of our lives before moving into another. Yet for the moment, let’s consider those who might find themselves acting similarly to a scoffer or fool – at least at the moment they face difficulty.

There’s a prophet recognized in the Jewish, Christian and Islamic traditions name Habakkuk (also pronounced Hab-a-cook by some). We don’t know a great deal about him, but as he was called to represent God amidst a foolish people….people rejecting a life of love (as I just described…he struggled. In the face of a community being torn apart by selfishness and division, also amidst the threat of imminent invasion by Babylon, and as he himself was condemned for trying to live in hope…Habakkuk questioned God. In Habakkuk Ch. 1, verses 2-5 of the Hebrew scriptures, it reads:

“O Lord, how long shall I cry; And You will not hear? Even cry out to You, “Violence!” And You will not save. Why do You show me iniquity, And cause me to see trouble? For plundering and violence are before me; There is strife, and contention arises. Therefore the law is powerless, And justice never goes forth. For the wicked surround the righteous; Therefore perverse judgment [God’s unfair judgement in Habakkuk’s eyes] proceeds.”

Then, the Lord replies:

“Look among the nations and watch — Be utterly astounded! For I will work a work in your days Which you would not believe, though it were told you.”

In short, much like the best friends of God like Habakkuk, a prophet, or even those who look for a healthier road, or those who have any kind of spiritual, positive faith…we all can struggle with doubt at times. Yet then, let’s compare the scoffer, the fool, who is drowning in their doubt and accusation. For them, there is no hope. All is lost. All is bad…except what they deem is good for them. An internet, bible resource called Got Questions, explains it this way:  

The word translated ‘scoffer’ in English can mean ‘one who mocks, ridicules, or scorns the belief of another.’ In Hebrew, the word translated ‘scoffer’ or ‘mocker’ can also mean ‘ambassador.’ So, a scoffer is one who not only disagrees with an idea, but he also considers himself an ambassador for the opposing idea. He cannot rest until he has demonstrated the foolishness of any idea not his own. A scoffer voices his disagreement, ridicules all who stand against him, and actively recruits others to join his side. In the Bible, scoffers are those who choose to disbelieve God and His Word. They say in their hearts, ‘There is no God’ (Psalm 14:1), and make it their ambition to ridicule those who follow God.”

For our purposes, a true scoffer or fool is one who tends to ridicule — if not hate —those who they deem are against them…often anyone, no matter a person of faith or not, who dares believe goodness can exist in the world and dares to desire to act like it. Unfortunately, I’ve run into too many of these within the law enforcement community. If an officer or other first responder, I expect you can think of a few candidates too.(3)

Yet with all that said, not even the scoffer or fool need remain stuck. No matter who we are or what period of life we might be going through, wherever we might be on the scale, help remains always available. When I ran into trouble as a cop a few years in, other more senior and mature officers including some in the administration noticed something was up, and they tried to help and encourage me. They pointed me to resources and acted as my friend. These officers actually helped me become who I am today, although nothing so grand was their intention. Yet they did help, so I always give God thanks for them and my experiences. (And now, that experience is a big part of why I volunteer as a police chaplain today – to try to love as I have been loved, and pass that same hope on to others.)

So, I encourage officers – anyone really – to use the signs of grace around them. If you had a mental, emotional, physical, and spiritual tool kit, what tools might be available to you? What might help you? Who might help you? Would counseling, a mentor, or a spiritual director be a resources? Could exercise or prescribed medication be the missing piece or part in need of attention if not repair? Could visiting with old friends or family – not just your law enforcement family – or volunteering among hopeful people be able to help you see beyond your police experience? (An experience where we often face a disproportionate amount of evil and suffering.) There’s a wide variety or methodologies out there as well as people available through your Employee Assistance Program, Wellness Team, chaplains, local faith communities, and among family and friends. These people are out there ready to help you and support you in becoming and staying at your best.

And if you try something and it isn’t a great fit? Try something else or reach out to another expert in the field, or in the community of faith, or a friend – whatever you like. Options always exist, and you need not ever get stuck. People do want to love and support you in this very difficult profession. That’s why I am here, and why I’ve made this podcast. If this podcast were only to help you and no one else, for me, that would be well worth all my time and effort. You are worth it, and what you do in service matters.

Endnotes:

(1) In calling someone a scoffer or fool in this construct, I suggest that this condition might be due to unhealthy thinking or choices over time. I am not referring to actual intelligence.

(2) I plan to address cynicism and safety in more detail in a later post and podcast. In my construct, a healthy skeptism is superior to cynacism. A healthy skeptic is not naive to danger and acts according to best practices of safety training, always alert to the possibilty of danger and ready to respond as trained. If danger comes, they tend to be less stressed, healthier and thus better able to identify their options and respond appropriately. They tend to act according to their training and circumstance rather than emotionally react. Feeling doubt and extreme suspicion about all humanity, as well as being prone to negative interpretations of their circumstances, a cynic might over anticipate if not be obsessessed by the possibility of resistance or violence. Not only can such attitudes impact personal health, they can create risk for becoming stuck in one’s alert state. Also troubling, some research has suggested that such a person might at times overcompensate with unnecessarily aggressive tactics and use of force. As you will often hear me say, healthier, better adjusted officers tend to perform better in their duties and offend less.

(3) The scoffer (or fool) in this construct is not necessarily without worldly knowledge or wisdom, but they are likely wounded by their experience in the world if not suffering from signs of burn out. They tend to be cynical and self-protective to an extreme. Thus, they can make poor decisions interacting with citizens or in use of force. Again, healthy officers are shown to tend to be better, more oositive and productive officers. They tend to be less likely to make bad decisions or offend.

Along with my past advanced degrees studies and continued education, my direct references contained in this episode included:

“Introduction to Habakkuk” at https://www.esv.org/resources/esv-global-study-bible/introduction-to-habakkuk/

“Are you too cyncical? The history, psychology, and philosophy of cynicism,” by Neel Burton, M.D, September 7, 2018, at https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/hide-and-seek/201809/are-you-too-cynical#

Unless otherwise indicated, all scripture quotations for this post are from the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) translation.

© 2022 The Rev. Louis Florio. All content not held under another’s copyright may not be used without permission of the author. Views are my own or those of my guests. Content does not necessarily reflect the views of any other organization or person(s).

DISCLAIMER: THIS WEBSITE/PODCAST DOES NOT PROVIDE MEDICAL ADVICE

Although I have served or do serve as a spiritual counselor, a chaplain, and/or ordained minister, I am not your counselor nor a medical professional. All content on this website and podcast is provided for informational and educational purposes only, does not constitute medical, psychological, or spiritual advice, and does not establish any kind of patient-client or pastor-congregant relationship. Although on this website and podcast, we strive to provide accurate general information, the information found through these posts are not a substitute for any kind of professional advice, and you should not rely solely on this content. Always consult a professional in the area of your particular needs and circumstances prior to making any professional, legal, medical, financial or tax-related decisions. Opinions expressed by the host or guests do not necessarily reflect those of any other person or entity.  

S1, E2 – “What in the h-e-double-toothpicks do we need a chaplain for?” (Essay)

A new episode is now available! Before digging deeper into topics related to law enforcement, Chaplain Lou helps unpack the history and purpose of modern law enforcment chaplaincy. For best practices, he encourages you to check out the International Conference of Police Chaplains (ICPC) at icpc4cops.org. Join in the conversation at anchor.fm or these apps: Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts. Chaplain Lou currently serves as Vice Chair (for Training) of the Hanover County Sherriff’s Office Chaplains Board (2008 – present) and as the City of Fredericksburg Police Department’s Chaplain (2019 – present).

Chaplain Lou is thankful to be a credentialed member of ICPC, but please remember all comments on this blog or podcast do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of ICPC or its membership.

Text from the recent podcast:

Welcome back, everyone. Thanks for joining today’s discussion at Midnights L-E-O.

As we begin, I am sure some people might wonder what a chaplain like me is doing in a place like this…and by that, I mean among modern law enforcement. Well, that’s an excellent question, and an important one to address before we go any further I suppose. To put it mildly (paraphrasing Radar O’Reilly on that old show, MASH), I often run into cops, identify myself for the first time as a chaplain, and they seem to wonder, “What in the h-e-double toothpicks do we need a chaplain for?” (They might think other words, but you get the idea. I am being kind.)  

I thought that question – a very real and excellent question – would be a great topic for our second episode. After all, why would you go to a chaplain or utilize a chaplain in your work if you don’t know what one is or could do. Now, you likely know that the use of chaplains for hospitals, military units, and even aristocratic families dates back easily to the early middle ages, but I would suggest we look even further back.

Consider indigenous populations or look in the ancient Hebrew scriptures or other such texts. It seems it has not been unusual for some kind of faith leader to accompany, pray for, and perhaps advise leaders as they start their governance, go to war or make weighty decisions. Indeed, in more recent times, many people are surprised to learn that Chief Sitting Bull was a shaman or medicine man…a spiritual leader…who as their Lakota tradition and practice allowed….was called forward to become a wartime leader. Perhaps because governance and warfare can have a spiritual dynamic, or moral and ethical issues remain so interwoven into those activities, cultures through today often find it helpful to have what we now know as chaplains to be present amidst the secular leaders.

Take for example the akicita societies of the Lakota. As warrior societies, they were also the ones who helped enforce the laws and cultural observances of the tribal community. Membership involved elements of being called by the people and the Great Spirit. It was a vocation or sacred call. Ritual was offered through the initiation ceremonies and beyond, because the spiritual and secular (as we call them today) overlapped and had no firm boundaries as they understood the world.

And with their special role, if someone selfishly went out too early to hunt buffalo for their own benefit (thus scaring them away and risking starvation for the tribe), or perhaps someone was being removed from the community, the tribal relationship, due to a crime, it was the warrior society that would often enforce the desired actions of the leadership. Those sacred societies were warriors, watchmen, de facto law enforcement, and more, but recognizing the moral injury that could result from such actions and the need for an upright spirit, there was always the recognition of the spiritual needs of their membership.

When eventually modern policing came to be…in 1829 under Robert Peele….you might recall that they came to be known affectionally as the Bobbies…they weren’t always welcomed at first. Indeed, there were so many deadly attacks on police officers, they quickly added a leather piece near the neckline of the uniforn because officer’s were being garroted with thin wires from behind. Like today, they faced personal danger, but they also were exposed to the suffering of others and life and death decisions. On top of that, officers died or became disabled, and their families struggled as a result. So, in 1842, the first chaplaincy for law enforcement came to be…it was called the London City mission. Initially, the focus was supporting officers and their families…sometimes sadly their widows and orphans…in concrete ways. Yet, spiritual support in this context was soon identified as a growing need. So in time, you found modern chaplains assisting in many more ways than first imagined in the 1800s – sometimes these are practical efforts, and sometimes spiritual, but hopefully always support offered out of love for the officers, their families and our greater community. Modern chaplains may or may not be ordained, but hopefully they have training of some sort in spiritual counseling and chaplaincy in general.

Now, when I say spiritual, it need not be Christian spirituality. There are Rabbis who serve, imams who serve, and even humanist chaplains who serve more from a philosophical rather than a religious context. In a good chaplaincy program, chaplains hopefully represent their community or at the very least have the training and willingness to meet people where they are. Their religious background is not as critical as their willingness not to evangelize or cajole, but rather help connect people to resources – practical and spiritual – that they need…to be a concrete, non-anxious presence offering care. Yet if the person wants to talk about spiritual things or have prayer? Well, that’s ok too. Chaplains can do that.

Thus, these chaplains, at least the better ones, are going to be prepared to counsel law enforcement officers and their families as requested. They might visit sick and injured officers to help lift morale. They can assist at sudden deaths or scenes likely to cause trauma. They might help supplement support systems of a department by being part of the peer support team, wellness team, critical incident stress debriefing teams, and similar such things. Chaplains could teach classes on subjects like stress or communication techniques in the home and touch upon spiritual practices as they do so – those spiritual practices can be as simple and nocuous as walking in nature and mindfulness techniques,  or one might pull from Buddhism or other spiritual traditions – just to expose people to varied options they might like to later explore in a way that might hopefully enrich their lives….and perhaps heal relationships. In time of day-to-day operations or civil unrest or crisis, chaplains can become a great bridge to faith communities to help calm things down or get resources committed through those faith organizations – This could mean volunteers, food, clothing or whatever.

In some places, chaplains can even serve on review boards for promotions or discipline – helping to evaluate the mental, emotional, and spiritual context of the people and matters at hand. And of course, they want to be among those they serve, so you can often find them on riedlongs answering calls for service with officers – getting to know officers and the people served, and supporting them as needed.

Thus, law enforcement chaplains are very much like secular counselors, but like military chaplains, they hopefully add a faith dynamic into the discussion and care. Chaplains can do a whole lot more than saying non-sectarian prayers at graduations and or presiding at funerals. Through non-anxious presence, they hopefully support all members of the police and greater community …helping them become more resilient and healthier.

So, that is a quick explanation of what chaplains might do, but it can vary greatly based on agency policy, needs, and context. If you would like to learn more, I suggest you take a look at the nonprofit that I maintain my credentials with – the International Conference of Police Chaplains or ICPC. You can find them at icpc4 cops.org.

That’s it for this episode. Stay safe, do some good, and I hope to see you again soon.

Unless otherwise indicated, all scripture quotations for this post are from the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) translation.

© 2022 The Rev. Louis Florio. All content not held under another’s copyright may not be used without permission of the author. Views are my own or those of my guests. Content does not necessarily reflect the views of any other organization or person(s).

DISCLAIMER: THIS WEBSITE/PODCAST DOES NOT PROVIDE MEDICAL ADVICE

Although I have served or do serve as a spiritual counselor, a chaplain, and/or ordained minister, I am not your counselor nor a medical professional. All content on this website and podcast is provided for informational and educational purposes only, does not constitute medical, psychological, or spiritual advice, and does not establish any kind of patient-client or pastor-congregant relationship. Although on this website and podcast, we strive to provide accurate general information, the information found through these posts are not a substitute for any kind of professional advice, and you should not rely solely on this content. Always consult a professional in the area of your particular needs and circumstances prior to making any professional, legal, medical, financial or tax-related decisions. Opinions expressed by the host or guests do not necessarily reflect those of any other person or entity.  

Waiting for the dawn? (Meditation)

When I was a law enforcement officer, I served mostly on midnight shift. The shift was staffed by a tight knit group of people who always watched out for one another. It was enjoyable not having to get involved with some of the city politics or neighbor disputes known to occupy the other shifts. Although it could be exceedingly quite at times, the type of calls could prove diverse and challenging. Yet when all was said and done, most officers on mids were like me. No matter how much the work energized them, they couldn’t wait for the dawn – a chance to survive the night and get home safely.

It has probably always been that way. Look at Psalm 130. It captures our universal hunger for God’s help by comparing it to a watchman waiting for the dawn:

5 I wait for the Lord, my soul waits,
    and in his word I hope;
my soul waits for the Lord
    more than those who watch for the morning,
    more than those who watch for the morning.

As a former law enforcement officer, particularly a midnight officer, that passage has always resonated with me. As we face hardships, suffering and death, we wait for the hope that comes with dawn. Ultimately, it isn’t just about our getting home safely. We hunger for a better world.

In that spirit, I am offering a new blog primarily for law enforcement and first responders. It will remain public, but it likely will resonate more with those who have shared this experience.

Welcome to Midnights LEO! We are waiting for the dawn together.

Find the podcast, Midnights LEO, with additional content at: anchor.fm/midnightsleo

If you want to see additional content by Chaplain Lou Florio, visit his personal blog and podcast:

2pennyblog.wordpress.com and anchor.fm/2pennyblog

Unless otherwise indicated, all scripture quotations for this post are from the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) translation.

© 2022 The Rev. Louis Florio. All content not held under another’s copyright may not be used without permission of the author.

DISCLAIMER: THIS WEBSITE/PODCAST DOES NOT PROVIDE MEDICAL ADVICE

Although I have served or do serve as a spiritual counselor, a chaplain, and/or ordained minister, I am not your counselor nor a medical professional. All content on this website and podcast is provided for informational and educational purposes only, does not constitute medical, psychological, or spiritual advice, and does not establish any kind of patient-client or pastor-congregant relationship. Although on this website and podcast, we strive to provide accurate general information, the information found through these posts are not a substitute for any kind of professional advice, and you should not rely solely on this content. Always consult a professional in the area of your particular needs and circumstances prior to making any professional, legal, medical, financial or tax-related decisions. Opinions expressed by the host or guests do not necessarily reflect those of any other person or entity.